PUBLIC WEB RESEARCH · Workflow idea

Get a useful starting answer and see where it came from.

Ask a question in a conversation and receive a plain-language response based on relevant public search results. Keep links and supporting context with the answer so the requester can check the original pages, spot gaps, and decide whether the response is suitable to share or act on.

A Roman aqueduct taking shape from architectural sketch to marble.
A little structure. A clearer outcome.
Starts with
A research question is asked
Produces
A conversational answer with supporting page links and any unresolved questions visible.
Category
Research & strategy

01 / The starting point

A clear request.
A useful direction.

A person asks a question about information available on public webpages

“Find relevant public information, prepare a source-linked answer, and make uncertainty clear for the requester to review.”
An example request · Make it specific to your team.

02 / The work

5 tasks.
One useful outcome.

Helps people get oriented on a web research question without opening and comparing every result themselves.

  1. Ask a focused question

    Describe the information needed and include relevant dates, locations, or constraints when they matter.

  2. Find relevant public sources

    Gather pages that appear to address the question and keep their original links available.

  3. Prepare a concise response

    Summarize useful information in plain language and connect key points to the pages they came from.

  4. Show gaps and uncertainty

    Flag conflicting, missing, or time-sensitive details and ask for clarification instead of filling gaps with guesses.

  5. Verify before relying on or sharing

    Have the requester check important claims at the original sources and approve any consequential recommendation or external response.

03 / The result

Something useful.
Something to build on.

A conversational answer with supporting page links and any unresolved questions visible.

AmbactiWorkflow folio · 5 steps

Answer web questions with source links

Research & strategy · Example outcome

The handoff

A conversational answer with supporting page links and any unresolved questions visible.

Keep in mind

Public pages may be outdated, misleading, or incomplete, and a summary can misrepresent the original. Check important claims at their sources, distinguish fact from interpretation, and require a person to approve consequential advice or the exact wording and audience before external sharing.

04 / Make it yours

Set the brief.
Set the standard.

A few choices shape the work around your team.

Choose the intended research topics

Define the kinds of public questions the assistant should help with and those that need a specialist.

Set response and source expectations

Choose how answers should show links, dates, conflicting evidence, and uncertainty.

Keep sensitive questions private

Tell users what not to include and limit access to conversation history to the people who need it.

Test current, conflicting, and unanswered topics

Check that the response reflects its sources and clearly says when evidence is weak or unavailable.

Keep exploring

Review public search findings

Turn a search question into an organized, source-linked summary for a researcher to verify and share when approved.

Prepare web research snapshots

Turn selected public pages into an organized research snapshot with source context for a person to verify.

Put your next idea to work.

Start with your brief. Make the process your own.

Explore more workflows ↗