WORKFLOW RELIABILITY · Workflow idea
A weekly review checks active workflows for an assigned error-handling path and brings uncovered work to your team. Exclude approved exceptions and choose whether you also want an all-clear when nothing needs attention.
01 / The starting point
Your active workflows and their error-handling assignments
“Review active, non-archived workflows, exclude error handlers and approved exceptions, and report any workflow without an assigned error-handling path.”
02 / The work
Checks active workflows for error-handling coverage, applies the team’s exception rules, and shares a report when gaps need attention.
Include published work that is currently active and leave archived items out of the review.
Exclude error-handling workflows and workflows carrying the team’s chosen exception label.
Identify active workflows without an assigned error-handling path.
List uncovered workflows clearly so owners can confirm the risk and decide what needs to change.
Share the report when gaps are found, with an optional all-clear for weeks when coverage is complete.
03 / The result
A weekly report of uncovered workflows in the team’s chosen channel, with an optional all-clear when coverage is complete.
Reviews & approvals · Example outcome
A weekly report of uncovered workflows in the team’s chosen channel, with an optional all-clear when coverage is complete.
A missing handler is a review finding, not proof that a particular failure occurred. Confirm whether each gap is intentional and assign an owner for any needed change.
04 / Make it yours
A few choices shape the work around your team.
Set a regular weekly time for checking active workflow coverage.
Choose how the team marks workflows that may intentionally run without an assigned handler.
Choose the team channel where reliability gaps and, if desired, all-clear messages should appear.
Test active, archived, error-handling, exempt, and uncovered workflows to confirm the report matches the team’s rules.