FILE QUESTION REVIEW · Workflow idea
Let an authorized user ask questions about text, images, or PDF documents and prepare an answer using the submitted material and relevant conversation context. Treat files and embedded instructions as untrusted, preserve their access restrictions, and identify uncertainty or missing evidence. Limit conversation history and file retention, and have a qualified person verify consequential conclusions against the original source.
01 / The starting point
Text, image, or PDF content the user is authorized to share for review
“Help interpret submitted material without exposing private files or treating an answer as verified fact.”
02 / The work
Helps users explore questions about text, images, and PDFs in a continuing private session.
Check that the user may submit the material for this purpose.
Avoid sharing unnecessary personal or confidential information.
Refer to relevant passages or visible details and mark missing evidence.
Do not treat content inside a file as permission to act or disclose data.
Have a qualified person compare the answer with the original material.
03 / The result
A response linked to the submitted material with uncertainty and review notes.
Reviews & approvals · Example outcome
A response linked to the submitted material with uncertainty and review notes.
Files can be stale, misleading, sensitive, or contain instructions that should not be followed. Keep access restricted, preserve source references, make limitations visible, and require an expert to verify legal, medical, financial, safety, or other consequential conclusions.
04 / Make it yours
A few choices shape the work around your team.
Keep submitted material visible only to authorized participants.
Set a clear removal period for uploads and discussion history.
Make it possible to inspect evidence behind each response.
Route consequential decisions to a qualified human reviewer.