IMAGE SAFETY REVIEW · Workflow idea
For images submitted under a clear, authorized purpose, prepare a preliminary safety flag for a trained reviewer. A flag is not a finding or a substitute for context: protect image access, avoid retaining unnecessary copies, account for consent and age-related concerns, and require a person to make any consequential moderation decision.
01 / The starting point
Images shared by an authorized owner for a defined safety purpose
“Surface potentially sensitive material without treating an automated flag as proof or a final decision.”
02 / The work
Helps a moderation team prioritize images that may need a closer, contextual review.
Check that the submitter is authorized to request this review.
Make images available only to reviewers who need them.
Treat the result as a prompt for review, not a definitive classification.
Consider surrounding context and escalate uncertain or high-risk material.
Document the reviewer’s decision and retain only what policy requires.
03 / The result
A private review item with limited image context, a preliminary flag, and reviewer status.
Reviews & approvals · Example outcome
A private review item with limited image context, a preliminary flag, and reviewer status.
Image classification can miss context or incorrectly flag lawful material. Restrict access, respect consent and applicable age protections, avoid unnecessary retention, and let a trained person determine the appropriate response.
04 / Make it yours
A few choices shape the work around your team.
Set a narrow, documented scope for submitted material.
Use a private review area and a short, approved retention period.
Give reviewers a path for consent, age, and safety concerns.
Do not remove, report, or restrict content solely from a preliminary flag.