ambacti
Explore workflows

SITE CONTENT REVIEW · Workflow idea

Make useful pages easier to find without adding links that mislead readers.

For a team or individual with an authorized purpose, prepare internal-link suggestions between selected site pages for an editor to review. A suggested match may not fit the page or reader’s intent, and site data may be private. Verify each source and destination in context, prioritize accessibility and clear link text, protect analytics and drafts, and require the site owner to approve changes before updating pages. Keep personal and confidential details limited to approved people, verify key facts and rights, and require an accountable person to approve the exact result before it is shared or acted on.

Make it yours See how it works ↓
A Roman aqueduct taking shape from architectural sketch to marble.
A little structure. A clearer outcome.
Starts with
A permitted request about possible links between relevant pages on an authorized site is ready for review
Produces
A private possible links between relevant pages on an authorized site review draft with source checks, uncertainty notes, and human approval status.
Category
Reviews & approvals

01 / The starting point

A clear request.
A useful direction.

A documented purpose, authorized source material, and an accountable reviewer

“Prepare possible links between relevant pages on an authorized site from permitted information for a person to review before any external or consequential action.”
An example request · Make it specific to your team.

02 / The work

5 tasks.
One useful outcome.

Prepare internal-link suggestions between selected site pages for an editor to review.

  1. Confirm source rights and intended use

    Check permission, licenses, attribution, and limits on reuse or adaptation.

  2. Keep claims tied to verifiable sources

    Check material statements against original sources and distinguish evidence from interpretation.

  3. Review originality and context

    Remove unsupported claims, close copying, misleading edits, and missing disclosures.

  4. Check the complete draft and audience

    Review accuracy, accessibility, context, and destination-specific requirements.

  5. Approve the exact release

    Require an editor or rights owner to approve the complete content and publication.

03 / The result

Something useful.
Something to build on.

A private possible links between relevant pages on an authorized site review draft with source checks, uncertainty notes, and human approval status.

AmbactiWorkflow folio · 5 steps

Review internal link opportunities

Reviews & approvals · Example outcome

The handoff

A private possible links between relevant pages on an authorized site review draft with source checks, uncertainty notes, and human approval status.

Keep in mind

A suggested match may not fit the page or reader’s intent, and site data may be private. Verify each source and destination in context, prioritize accessibility and clear link text, protect analytics and drafts, and require the site owner to approve changes before updating pages.

04 / Make it yours

Set the brief.
Set the standard.

A few choices shape the work around your team.

Record sources and permissions

Keep allowed uses, attribution, expiration dates, and content owners with each asset.

Set factual and editorial standards

Define evidence, disclosures, voice, accessibility, and review expectations.

Protect unpublished material

Restrict briefs, transcripts, drafts, and source files to authorized reviewers.

Require approval before publishing

Do not release, schedule, or distribute a draft without explicit sign-off.

Put your next idea to work.

Start with your brief. Make the process your own.

Explore more workflows ↗