ambacti
Explore workflows

KNOWLEDGE CHAT REVIEW · Workflow idea

Give each question a useful answer grounded in information your team trusts.

For an authenticated user and an approved knowledge collection, identify whether the question asks for a fact, explanation, perspective, or personal context, then retrieve relevant material and prepare an answer with supporting sources. Respect document permissions and user-specific boundaries, state when evidence is missing or conflicting, avoid presenting an opinion as fact, and route consequential or unresolved requests to a qualified person.

Make it yours See how it works ↓
A Roman aqueduct taking shape from architectural sketch to marble.
A little structure. A clearer outcome.
Starts with
An authorized user asks a knowledge question
Produces
An answer with relevant source references, uncertainty notes, and human escalation status.
Category
Reviews & approvals

01 / The starting point

A clear request.
A useful direction.

A permitted question and documents the user is authorized to access

“Prepare a source-grounded response without inventing facts or exposing restricted information.”
An example request · Make it specific to your team.

02 / The work

5 tasks.
One useful outcome.

Helps teams answer questions from an approved knowledge base using the relevant source material.

  1. Verify the user and knowledge scope

    Confirm the requester may access the selected documents and topic.

  2. Clarify the kind of answer requested

    Distinguish a factual lookup from analysis, a viewpoint, or personal context.

  3. Retrieve relevant approved sources

    Use only documents in scope and preserve titles, dates, and access limits.

  4. Prepare a cited answer with uncertainty

    State what the sources support and flag missing, conflicting, or outdated evidence.

  5. Escalate consequential questions

    Route policy, legal, medical, financial, or unresolved requests to a qualified person.

03 / The result

Something useful.
Something to build on.

An answer with relevant source references, uncertainty notes, and human escalation status.

AmbactiWorkflow folio · 5 steps

Review knowledge-base chat responses

Reviews & approvals · Example outcome

The handoff

An answer with relevant source references, uncertainty notes, and human escalation status.

Keep in mind

A retrieved passage may be outdated, incomplete, or outside the user’s access scope. Enforce document permissions at retrieval, cite the sources used, flag gaps and conflicts, avoid inferring sensitive personal context, and escalate decisions or uncertain answers to a responsible human.

04 / Make it yours

Set the brief.
Set the standard.

A few choices shape the work around your team.

Curate approved knowledge collections

Assign owners and review dates to the documents that may inform responses.

Enforce user-level source permissions

Do not retrieve or quote material a user is not authorized to see.

Set citation and uncertainty expectations

Require source links and clear handling of missing or conflicting material.

Define human escalation paths

Name qualified owners for consequential topics and unresolved questions.

Put your next idea to work.

Start with your brief. Make the process your own.

Explore more workflows ↗