ambacti
Explore workflows

CONTRIBUTION CONTEXT · Workflow idea

Keep project contributions visible without creating uncertain contact records.

When a contributor opens a proposed change to a selected project, check whether the available identity reliably matches an existing person in your customer records. Prepare a factual note for that person’s record only after review, and do not create a new contact or send a message based on the contribution alone.

Make it yours See how it works ↓
A Roman aqueduct taking shape from architectural sketch to marble.
A little structure. A clearer outcome.
Starts with
New project contribution
Produces
A factual contribution note proposed for a verified existing person’s record, held until an authorized owner approves it.
Category
Reviews & approvals

01 / The starting point

A clear request.
A useful direction.

A proposed change opened by a contributor on a selected public project

“Verify the contributor identity against an existing person, prepare a source-linked note for review, and leave unmatched activity untouched.”
An example request · Make it specific to your team.

02 / The work

6 tasks.
One useful outcome.

Helps a team retain relevant public project context alongside an existing relationship when the contributor’s identity can be confirmed.

  1. Select the projects in scope

    Review contributions only for public projects the team has chosen to monitor.

  2. Gather the contribution’s public context

    Capture its project, author information when available, and source reference without adding private details.

  3. Match the contributor to an existing person

    Require a reliable identity match with the existing record and leave missing or conflicting identities unresolved.

  4. Prepare a concise record note

    Describe the public contribution factually and include enough source context for a teammate to verify it.

  5. Approve the exact record update

    Have an authorized owner check the identity, relevance, and wording before the note is added.

  6. Keep new contact and outreach separate

    Do not create a person or send a message because of a contribution; require separate permission and approval.

03 / The result

Something useful.
Something to build on.

A factual contribution note proposed for a verified existing person’s record, held until an authorized owner approves it.

AmbactiWorkflow folio · 6 steps

Review project contribution notes

Reviews & approvals · Example outcome

The handoff

A factual contribution note proposed for a verified existing person’s record, held until an authorized owner approves it.

Keep in mind

A public contribution does not establish commercial interest or consent to contact. Use an exact, reliable identity match, include only relevant public details, and require approval before updating a person’s record. Never create a contact or send outreach from an uncertain match.

04 / Make it yours

Set the brief.
Set the standard.

A few choices shape the work around your team.

Choose projects and contribution events

Define which project activity is useful to retain and which events should be ignored.

Set identity matching requirements

Specify the reliable details needed to connect a contributor with an existing person and how ambiguity is handled.

Limit note content and assign reviewers

Choose approved note fields and name who checks relevance, identity, and record changes.

Test matched and unmatched activity

Check verified, missing, and conflicting identities and confirm that unmatched activity creates no contact or message.

Put your next idea to work.

Start with your brief. Make the process your own.

Explore more workflows ↗