ambacti
Explore workflows

RESEARCH REVIEW · Workflow idea

Organize a literature review while keeping inclusion decisions transparent and checkable.

For work involving authorized research papers, documented inclusion criteria, and proposed screening decisions, check the facts and permissions before taking the next step. Prepare paper summaries, proposed eligibility reasons, and a source-linked review log for researchers. Screening can omit relevant studies or misread methods and findings. Confirm access and reuse rights, validate decisions against full papers, preserve reasons and uncertainty, protect unpublished research, and require researchers to approve inclusion and conclusions.

Make it yours See how it works ↓
A Roman aqueduct taking shape from architectural sketch to marble.
A little structure. A clearer outcome.
Starts with
A scoped request is ready for review
Produces
A review-ready brief about authorized research papers, documented inclusion criteria, and proposed screening decisions, with source checks, uncertainty, and approval status.
Category
Reviews & approvals

01 / The starting point

A clear request.
A useful direction.

authorized research papers, documented inclusion criteria, and proposed screening decisions, an authorized source, and a named owner

“Prepare authorized research papers, documented inclusion criteria, and proposed screening decisions for informed review without treating an unverified draft, estimate, or match as final.”
An example request · Make it specific to your team.

02 / The work

5 tasks.
One useful outcome.

Prepare paper summaries, proposed eligibility reasons, and a source-linked review log for researchers.

  1. Set a narrow question and permitted sources

    Define scope and dates and respect access, collection, and reuse conditions.

  2. Check claims against original evidence

    Open primary references and preserve links, retrieval dates, and relevant context.

  3. Show gaps and uncertainty

    Separate observations from estimates and flag incomplete or conflicting evidence.

  4. Protect people and source material

    Limit identifiers and honor participant, source, and rights-holder requirements.

  5. Approve findings before circulation

    Have a responsible researcher verify evidence, interpretation, and intended use.

03 / The result

Something useful.
Something to build on.

A review-ready brief about authorized research papers, documented inclusion criteria, and proposed screening decisions, with source checks, uncertainty, and approval status.

AmbactiWorkflow folio · 5 steps

Review literature screening decisions

Reviews & approvals · Example outcome

The handoff

A review-ready brief about authorized research papers, documented inclusion criteria, and proposed screening decisions, with source checks, uncertainty, and approval status.

Keep in mind

Screening can omit relevant studies or misread methods and findings. Confirm access and reuse rights, validate decisions against full papers, preserve reasons and uncertainty, protect unpublished research, and require researchers to approve inclusion and conclusions.

04 / Make it yours

Set the brief.
Set the standard.

A few choices shape the work around your team.

Record source scope and retrieval dates

Keep the question, source links, access conditions, and review period traceable.

Set citation and verification standards

Require direct checks for material claims and keep uncertainty visible.

Protect private notes and source material

Restrict research files and honor privacy, copyright, and source requirements.

Require expert review of conclusions

Do not present a forecast, ranking, or interpretation as established fact without review.

Keep exploring

Review job-market signals

Spot hiring patterns without turning job listings into a judgment about a company or person. Check the evidence, protect relevant information, and keep consequential choices with an accountable person.

Review private offering filing records

Organize filing data without mistaking a disclosure for a complete investment picture. Check the evidence, protect relevant information, and keep consequential choices with an accountable person.

Review community question research

Find conversations worth learning from without turning a community post into a sales target. Check the evidence, protect relevant information, and keep consequential choices with an accountable person.

Put your next idea to work.

Start with your brief. Make the process your own.

Explore more workflows ↗