CONTRACT DATA REVIEW · Workflow idea

Find contract fields that need a closer human check.

Compare extracted contract details with the original contract text one field at a time. Flag values that cannot be found or appear to conflict with the source, while keeping final interpretation with a reviewer.

A Roman aqueduct taking shape from architectural sketch to marble.
A little structure. A clearer outcome.
Starts with
Contract and extracted details
Produces
A field-by-field check that marks values passing the configured checks separately from missing or conflicting values that need human review.
Category
Documents

01 / The starting point

A clear request.
A useful direction.

Original contract text and the fields extracted for review

“Check each extracted field against the original contract. Identify values that are not supported by the text or conflict with a different value, and explain which fields need a person to review.”
An example request · Make it specific to your team.

02 / The work

6 tasks.
One useful outcome.

Compares extracted field values with the supplied contract text, checks whether each value appears in the source and whether the source states a different value, and routes suspicious fields with an explanation for review.

  1. Provide the source contract text

    Keep the original text available alongside the extracted fields so every check has source material to compare.

  2. List the extracted fields

    Provide each contract value to check and identify the field it is meant to represent.

  3. Check whether each value appears in the source

    Flag a field when its extracted value cannot be found in the supplied contract text.

  4. Check for conflicting source values

    Flag a field when the contract text appears to state a different value from the extraction.

  5. Explain fields needing attention

    Give reviewers a human-readable reason for each suspicious or conflicting field.

  6. Review important terms before use

    Have a person compare flagged fields and consequential terms with the original contract before relying on the extracted record.

03 / The result

Something useful.
Something to build on.

A field-by-field check that marks values passing the configured checks separately from missing or conflicting values that need human review.

AmbactiWorkflow folio · 6 steps

Verify extracted contract terms against the source

Documents · Example outcome

The handoff

A field-by-field check that marks values passing the configured checks separately from missing or conflicting values that need human review.

Keep in mind

A field that passes these checks is not a legal approval or guarantee that the extraction is correct. A qualified person should verify important terms against the full contract before relying on them.

04 / Make it yours

Set the brief.
Set the standard.

A few choices shape the work around your team.

Choose the contract and extraction source

Select where the original text and extracted field values come from, and make sure they remain associated with the same contract.

Define the fields to verify

List every contract field to check and prepare both a source-presence check and a conflicting-value check for each.

Set the review threshold

Choose how cautious the review should be and which risk levels require a person to inspect the field.

Choose the human review queue

Set who reviews flagged fields, where they see the explanation and original text, and how the final decision is recorded.

Put your next idea to work.

Start with your brief. Make the process your own.

Explore more workflows ↗